BlogHawgs NCAAF Week 2 Picks Revisited
Posted by Brett Kincaid on September 14, 2009
Standings After Week 2
Adam (14-11-1), Brett (15-10-1)
Last Week
Adam (5-7-1), Brett (8-4-1)
——————–
| Road | Home | Line | Adam | Brett |
| Clemson | Georgia Tech | GTU -4.5 | Ga Tech | Ga Tech |
| This one looked like a Ga Tech romp. Defensive collapse ruined what looked like an easy pick. | ||||
| North Carolina | Connecticut | UNC -3.5 | UNC | U Conn |
| North Carolina survived the game thanks to a safety — sending gamblers to the Maalox bottles. | ||||
| Iowa | Iowa St. | Iowa -7 | Iowa | Iowa St. |
| Critical mistake by BK: Never, ever, under any circumstances, bet on Iowa St. | ||||
| Syracuse | Penn St. | PSU -28 | Penn St. | Syracuse |
| True to form, Penn St. took a solid win without covering the number. It happens each September. | ||||
| Arkansas St. | Nebraska | NU -24 | Nebraska | Arkansas St. |
| I probably got a little too excited by ASU’s 61-point rout of Mississippi Valley State. I forgot Jerry Rice was no longer there. | ||||
| Notre Dame | Michigan | ND -4.5 | Notre Dame | Notre Dame |
| If I can ever wager, lose, and be happy, this is the situation. | ||||
| TCU | Virginia | TCU -12 | TCU | TCU |
| This one was a layup. | ||||
| Houston | Oklahoma St. | OSU -15.5 | Houston | Houston |
| I wish I had actually called the upset. I suppose cashing a winning ticket will have to suffice. | ||||
| Vanderbilt | LSU | LSU -14 | LSU | Vandy |
| It looked at times like both teams were sure to cover. In the end, a tie is not a loss in the gambling world. | ||||
| South Carolina | Georgia | UGA -7.5 | Georgia | So Carolina |
| Great game made even better by a Carolina cover. | ||||
| USC | Ohio St. | USC -6 | USC | Ohio St. |
| I tihnk we learned two things: 1) Take a Top 10 team at home getting points at night and 2) Neither of these teams are as good as we probably thought. | ||||
| UCLA | Tennessee | UT -9 | UCLA | UCLA |
| hahahahahaha… | ||||
| Mississippi St. | Auburn | AU -14.5 | Miss St. | Auburn |
| Auburn may be good. No…seriously…they really may be good. | ||||
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.